tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16103538.post114591206521660260..comments2023-06-22T06:46:19.888-07:00Comments on Just another disenfranchised father: Another shrewJohn Doehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05326982429461344063noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16103538.post-1167255049089419692006-12-27T13:30:00.000-08:002006-12-27T13:30:00.000-08:00after reading these comments, i think i know who a...after reading these comments, i think i know who anonymous is, no other then Cindy Ross.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16103538.post-1148944967256657312006-05-29T16:22:00.000-07:002006-05-29T16:22:00.000-07:00"Don't libel me: I did not call the children liars..."Don't libel me: I did not call the children liars"<BR/><BR/>Libel: Any written or published material tending to injure a person's reputation unjustly<BR/><BR/>Pointing out the ignorant and idiotic comments posted by a person using the name "John Doe" is hardly libel. However, maligning both Ms. Richards and Mr. Lasseur by disseminating lies and misinformation about them most certainly is libel.<BR/><BR/>Moreover, by calling the BTS documentary a "smear" job, you are clearly trying to discredit the children (both minors and adult children of abusive fathers) whose stories are profiled within. That amounts to calling them liars.<BR/><BR/>BTW, BTS did not make any statement about all fathers being abusive, nor about normal fathers deserving to lose custody of their children. In fact, in all of the cases profiled involving custody disputes the father gained custody, then went on to block most, or even all, contact between the children and their mothers (i.e., alienating them), with the assistance both of the court/court appointed therapists and evaluators.<BR/><BR/>The bottom line is that WHEN the father is abusive, he is not only more likely to get custody, but to go on to alienate the children, in addition to whatever abuse he has already perpetrated.<BR/><BR/>So what exactly is your point, other than being an ignorant and biased hypocrite?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16103538.post-1148682420223679122006-05-26T15:27:00.000-07:002006-05-26T15:27:00.000-07:00It is perfectly possible to execute a smear job vi...It is perfectly possible to execute a smear job via selective reporting, a favorite tactic of PAS opponents. Like I said "not telling the truth is lying", thus one can lie by failing to tell the whole story.<BR/><BR/>Don't libel me: I did not call the children liars.<BR/><BR/>I confess that I know little more about Gardner himself than I have (mostly) learned from various websites which are quite rabidly determined to malign him and are therefore highly suspect, but I know that PAS exists and should be dealt with as the crime of child abuse that it is.John Doehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05326982429461344063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16103538.post-1148600865116045172006-05-25T16:47:00.000-07:002006-05-25T16:47:00.000-07:00"the smear job that was "Breaking the Silence: Chi..."the smear job that was "Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories"<BR/><BR/>The only "smearing" relative to BTS has come from fathers'groups that have libeled Mr. Dominique Lasseur, implying that he is a man-hater who didn't properly research the stories profiled. Nothing could be further from the truth. Moreover, the cases involving "PAS" in BTS all involved the children confirming that the fathers had not only abused them, but had actively fought to destroy their relationships with -- i.e., to alienate them from -- mothers who were trying to protect them. How does documenting this smear normal, non abusive fathers, anyway? BTW, I have met several of the children. Why don't you give me your name and email address. Let's contact them and see their reaction at you having called them liars...<BR/><BR/>"It is worth noting that Gardner is dead and unable to defend himself"<BR/><BR/>True, Gardner is dead. Why didn't you mention that he killed himself in an especially gory and bloody suicide after being exposed as a pervert and a fraud. BTW, Did you know that Gardner lied about his status at Columbia University? Did you know that he was an unpaid volunteer? Dr. Richard Gardner MD -Autopsy Report <BR/>http://cincinnatipas.com/dr-richardgardnerautopsy.html<BR/><BR/>"and a careful reading of what he wrote quickly shows that he did not advocate incest at all."<BR/><BR/>Did you even do your homework? Gardner worked to advocate for all kinds of paraphilias, even sex with dead bodies. (What does this have to do with custody anyway?)http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume5/j5_2_8.htm<BR/><BR/>BTW, IPT is Ralph Underwager's website. He's dead too, but it's common knowledge that even the FMSF kicked them off their board for advocating pedophilia. Did you know think Ralph was a member of CRC (formerly NCCR), the same fathers'/shared parenting group that Garder used to present for?:<BR/>http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/NudistHallofShame/Underwager2.html<BR/><BR/>"PAS is the systematic alienation of a child from a parent, usually by the other parent."<BR/><BR/>How many fathers do you know who lost custody and/or went to jail for alienating their children? Please provide me with at least one case number...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com