Today's prize for really crappy "social science" research with an agenda goes to Leonie Bloomfield (female) at the Social Policy Research Centre, Victoria, Australia, who thinks that a study of 200 men shows that more free time means laziness and boredom which means higher mortality. She also thinks "men already enjoy much more [free time] than women, because of gender inequalities in housework, childcare and other unpaid work". No female control group is mentioned. Nothing is said about the employment status, age, social level, death rate, etc. of the sample. Hmmm. Can we see just the faintest outlines of an agenda here? Men die sooner because they don't do the housework? I can just see all those overworked housewives clucking over their coffees while oggling the photo of some oiled-up beefcake in an apron tickling his hifi with a feather duster.
Who pays these people?
Tags: Bad Science, Male Mortality.
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(155)
-
▼
June
(19)
- Privacy or Justice? A small victory for sense.
- Tong and Mack
- Are we not men?
- Feminism is not a conspiracy, or how to avoid beco...
- Court bias against mothers...?
- Why Dads Matter.
- Go on, belt him one, he deserves it.
- Father's day news items
- The big piece of chicken
- Live longer, do more housework!
- Legal crimes, invisible victims
- The Best Interests of the Child - Part 2
- Toward a philosphy of child custody
- Fathers? What fathers?
- The tyranny of coupledom.
- The Best Interests of the Child - Part 1
- Ironwoman
- OK, you open the door for me then.
- Men's studies or feminism-for-men?
-
▼
June
(19)
No comments:
Post a Comment