Well, the BBC web site actually published something moderately favorable to fathers. It seems that fathers have significantly lower testosterone levels - "the lower levels of testosterone in fathers may reflect both their withdrawal from the competitive arena and their involvement in paternal care."
But "A UK expert said the fall was nature's way of ensuring men behaved in a "civilised" and non-aggressive way around newborn offspring.", so if you're not a father, you're still an animal who can't be trusted to behave himself. Sigh.
Nevertheless, perhaps this might add some weight to the idea that being a father has some significance and consequences for a man although it appalls me that this has to be pointed out at all.
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(85)
-
▼
November
(16)
- What's wrong with this picture?
- The Missing Persons of Domestic Violence: Battered...
- Books that don't exist
- Dating as hostage taking?
- Parthenogenesis here we come.
- 'I wasn't prepared for the grief I feel after the ...
- George Rolph, The Anatomy of Abuse
- Child maltreatment in the US
- Should I Apologize For Being Angry?
- The knife, the murder weapon of choice for the Bri...
- "If" by Rudyard Kipling
- Biased? The BBC? Nawww...
- Fathers and testosterone.
- "It was just a silly row"
- Nymphomania and feminism's most despicable accompl...
- Every 35 minutes, a man in the US commits suicide ...
-
▼
November
(16)
No comments:
Post a Comment