Now I'm no musician, but this one sounds distinctly out of tune.
Johann Sebastian Bach is now claimed to have stolen some of his credit from his second wife Anna Magdalena Bach neƩ Wilcke. Some Aussie professor, one Martin Jarvis, thinks that "police forensic science techniques" can rewrite the history books and claims that Anna wrote some of his most popular works (it couldn't possibly have been any of the more mundane, could it?). Sigh. Of course, this is all reported with great fanfare and as if the fat lady has already sung. "We know there are a number of works attributed to J. S. Bach that weren't written by him at all," says Jarvis, including Toccata and Fuge in D minor. We do? An admittedly quick bit of research shows up no hits on that idea and given the fame of the piece I would have expected the feminist horn to have played the idea loud and long. You know the one: DA-DA-DA dadadada daa daa.
A little further down the Telegraph article, we find that all is not harmonious in the musical world.
Stephen Rose: "It is plausible that she corrected, refined and revised many of his compositions, although there is not enough evidence to show that she single-handedly composed the Cello Suites."
Julian Lloyd Weber: 'Cellists who have performed the Suites extensively remained sceptical. Julian Lloyd Webber insisted that the compositions were "stylistically totally Bach" and that "many composers had appalling handwriting, which meant better copies would naturally have been made, with the originals then discarded"'. (It's already well known that Anna Magdelena transcribed many of his later works.)
Steven Isserlis: "We can't say that it is definitely not true, in the same way that we can't prove that Anne Hathaway did not write some of Shakespeare's work, but I don't believe this to be a serious theory."
Oh well, I guess given that Einstein's a fraud too, we shouldn't be surprised that one of the world's musical geniuses was cheating on his second fiddle as well.
Nah, in the absence of a clean, clear note otherwise, i.e. a manuscript of the same level of talent which can unequivocally be ascribed to her, I think I'll sing along to the old melody, police forensics be damned.
Technorati Tags: Revisionism, Bach, Johann Sebastian Bach, Anna Magdelena Wilcke, Martin Jarvis
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(155)
-
▼
April
(41)
- NYS escapes me
- Joint custody - that which doesn't kill you...
- The mythology of rape.
- Bach gets fugued
- Accusations, TROs, supervised visitation and PAS
- From debtor's prison to slavery, but it's rehabili...
- Fathers rights dead in Albany
- The Unimaginable Horror...
- Girl scouts, harmless, really.
- Another shrew
- Elian Gonzalez
- False allegations kill
- No? Really?
- NY Times: Men don't exist
- Adultery, hypocrisy, fatherhood
- Those silly farkers
- A lawyer who feels bad...
- Bizarre child custody decision
- Chivalry today?
- The First Step Towards Destroying a Parent Is Made...
- Happy PAS Easter
- Sexism
- Eternal Bachelor
- BMJ likes its women on top.
- Witch hunt!
- Not guilty but still under suspicion
- the principal impediment to child abuse is a father
- Fathers 4 Justice are back
- What is wrong with these people?
- Kick 'im out, then kick 'im down.
- bioMom loses kids to nonbioMom
- Let the children speak
- Gallantry is a virtue that dare not speak its name.
- 10 yr old in court for racial slurs.
- CNN wakes up and smells the coffee
- The three crimes of PAS
- Parental Abduction: the profoundest of parental al...
- Censorship works.
- The conservative/feminist alliance
- End women's suffrage!
- "Fit parent" drowns baby gets 5 yrs probation
-
▼
April
(41)
No comments:
Post a Comment